Banishment and Surveillance: War on Drugs and spatial chasm.
Guerra às drogas e cisão espacial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v12.1038Keywords:
Criminologia Crítica, Surveillance, Política de Drogas, Direito Penal, BanópticoAbstract
Abstract
The development of surveillance has brought to surface new structures of banishment. The Banoptic model is the corner stone of the method of choice in this paper. It is used to verify in what way the judiciary sphere of power creates and strenghtens social exclusion in the light of conviction by the crime of criminal conspiracy to sell drugs by the Superior Tribunal of Justice. Several decisions concerning habeas corpus were collected and examined using an empirical inductive perspective under the banoptic model. The conclusion was that the jurisprudence has acted towards creating policies of exclusion by strengtneing arguments that derive the certaintity of culpability solely by the area that the person has been arrested, with police statements having an impotant role in maintaining the status quo and securing convictions.
Key words: Critical Criminology: Surveillance: Drug Policy: Criminal Law: Banopticon
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use, in scientific, educational, non-commercial applications, with citation of the source.
The papers published in Revista Opinião Filosófica are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
