In defense of intuitions: a reply to Rolla.
Uma resposta a Rolla
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v14.1140Keywords:
intuitions, epistemology, thought experiments, methodology, naturalismAbstract
Rolla (2021) argued that the practice of evaluating epistemological theories based on intuitions yielded by the consideration of some cases, like hypothetical scenarios with envatted brains, clairvoyants and epistemic guardian angels, is a mistake. A mistake that, once recognized, would make the problems and methods that occupy epistemology change significantly. In this paper, I hold that Rolla’s argument doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gregory Gaboardi (Leitor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use, in scientific, educational, non-commercial applications, with citation of the source.
The papers published in Revista Opinião Filosófica are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
