Justice and weighting of fundamental rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v10i1.895Abstract
The objective of this text is to evaluate the perspective of the effectiveness of justice in the concrete cases of collision of fundamental rights in the theory of weighting constructed by Robert Alexy. The interrelationship between weighing judgments and the justice of decision permeates all research work. To do so, it seeks to elucidate the unfolding of weighting as a rational argumentative activity as a motto for the realization of justice, using reflections on justice based on Chaïm Perelman. The decisive purpose of the study is to highlight that the weighting must follow forms and rules of rational legal argumentation and criteria of the weighting procedure, showing that the problem is not in the weighting but in its correct application in a concrete situation of fundamental rights their nature as principles.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use, in scientific, educational, non-commercial applications, with citation of the source.
The papers published in Revista Opinião Filosófica are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
